No proposal to remove Restriction in Number of spells in Child Care Leave – DOPT
No proposal to remove Restriction in Number of spells in Child Care Leave – DOPT Clarifies in its letter to Confederation of Central Government Employees and Workers
No.13018/6/2013-Estt.(L)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 31st July, 2014
To
Shri.M.Krishnan,
Secretary General,
Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers,
1st Floor, North Avenue PO Building,
New Delhi – 110001
Subject: Child Care Leave (CCL) for removal of limit of 3 spells in a calender year – regarding.
I am directed to refer to Confederation of Central Govt. Employees & Workers letter dated 30.06.2014 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the matter was considered in this Department.
It is stated the condition of restricting the number of spells for which CCL can be allowed to a female Government servant during a year provides check & balance to ensure that demands of public service are not sacrificed or compromised with and that there is no dislocation of work, thus there is no proposal to review the said condition for its deletion.
Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(S.G.Mulchandaney)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
DOPT Clarification No.13018/6/2013-Estt.(L) dated 31.07.2014

📢 Stay Updated with GConnect
Join our Whatsapp channels for the latest news and job updates:
Join GConnect News Join GConnect JobsGConnect News
GConnect Jobs
You might also like:
IRTSA Flags Key Issues in 8th CPC Online Submission Process, Seeks Major Revisions
Vigilance Clearance: CVC Revises Proforma, Expands Details Required Under Point No. 7
Government Prioritising AI Upskilling of Employees Through iGOT Karmayogi Platform: DoPT
What Counts as “Unbecoming Conduct” Under CCS Conduct Rules? Real Examples Explained
Pay Fixation on Promotion or MACP Governed by CCS (Revised Pay) Rules 2016 and Fundamental Rules: Finance Ministry
7th CPC: Government Clarifies Rule on Next Increment in Pay Stepping Up Cases