What we expect from 7th Pay Commission ?
What we expect from 7th Pay Commission? – Anomalies in 6th CPC Pay Fixation policies which are to be avoided by 7th Pay Commission
Mr.M.Dorai, Deputy Director, ESIC Model Hospital, Bangalore (Ministry of Labour, Government of India, is the author of this article.
His earlier article in GConnect – โNPS is far beneficial than Government Pensionโโ (Click here to read his previous article) is receiving the attention of a large number of Central Government Employees with mixed reaction.
The Central Government employees are rejoiced over the timely constitution of 7th Central Pay Commission by the Government of India. This will not only pave the way for implementing the revised pay scales promptly from 1-1-2016 but also save the government from the burden of incurring huge expenditure towards settlement of arrears.
What is very important now is, 7th Central Pay Commission must re-examine the methods adopted by 6th CPC in the matter of formulation of pay scales, pay fixation policies, fitment benefits etc. which consist of many anomalies / disparities leading to disgruntlement among central government employees.
I have touched upon some of these anomalies of 6th CPC recommendations which are quite peculiar in nature and are first of its kind in the history of Central Pay Commissionsโ recommendations so far:
I – 6th CPC Broader Pay Bands has no relevance with Pay Fixation:
The 6th CPC had come out with a new concept of formulation of few broader pay bands bringing into its fold as many as 34 pre-revised pay scales / cadres which existed in the V CPC.ย The pay bands from P.B 1 to P.B.4 carries common pay scales for several cadres as follows:
6th CPC Broader Pay Bands
5TH CPC Pay Scale | PayBand | 6TH CPC correspondingcommon Pay Band Scales | No.of scales/cadres merged |
S-1, S-2,S2-A.,S3 | -IS | 4440-7440 | 4 |
S-4 to S-8 | PB-1 | 5200-20200 | 5 |
S-9 to S-15 | PB-2 | 9300-34800 | 7 |
S-16 to S-23 | PB-3 | 15600-39100 | 9 |
S-24 to S-29 | PB-4 | 37400-67000 | 6 |
S-30 | HAG | 67000-79000 | 1 |
S-31 to S-32 | HAG+ | 75500-80000 | 2 |
S-33 | Apex | 80,000(Fixed) | 1 |
S-34 | Cab.Sec. | 90,000(Fixed) | 1 |
However, all the 34 pre-revised scales of the 5th CPC still distinctly exist as same number of revised pay scales even after implementation of 6th CPC, as per detailed Pay Fitment Table circulatedย ย vide O.M No.F.No.1/1/2008-IC dated 30/8/2008ย by Ministry of Finance (Click here).
The Fitment Table depicts the full list of all the Pre-revised V Pay Scale from S-1 to S-34ย with its equivalent 6th CPC Pay.ย Fitment Table also provides 6th CPC revised pay for each of the increment stage in pre-revised pay.
This fitment table was actually utilized by all the central government departments for fixation of pay of all the government employees who were in service as on 1/1/2006.ย Needless to say, 6th CPC Broader Pay bands have no relevance here.ย Even the pay of new recruits were based on entry Pay Structure underย Section II of Part A of First Schedule of CCS(Revised Pay) Rules, 2008- (Click here).
No correlation between 6th CPC Broader Pay Bands and Fitment Table:
It is could be noticed that minimum pay in Broader 6th CPC pay band applicable to a post or cadre is always lesser than the starting pay of an employee (both direct recruit and existing employee) in that post (except for P.B 4).ย This is due to absence of Correlation between 6th CPC pay bands and Fitment Tables.
II. Adopting three different pay fixation methods, that create anomaly in the pay of employees who are promoted, those in service as on 1/1/2006 and those are newly recruited after 01.01.2006
Well, Fitment Tables should have been applied uniformly for employees who continue in the same post, promotees and new appointees (New Entrants)l, which is not the case here. While Fundamental Rules stipulates equal pay for equal work, pay of employees who are promoted / granted MACP are to be fixed at the stages relevant to them like Direct Recruits whose initial pay is much more than minimum pay in the pay band applicable to them. However 6th CPC has not followed same principles for Promotee employees and Direct Recruits. In fact 6th CPC has stipulated three different types of Pay fixation which was made applicable to following three cases.
The following chart incorporating the 3 different pay fixations formulated by the 6th CPC ย clearly reflect the true picture of this strange situation.
Post/ Grade |
FIFTH CPC PAY SCALE |
Name of Pay Band/ Scale |
PAY IN PAY BANDS (APPLICABLE FOR PROMOTION AFTER 1/1/2006 (With 3% Increment)
|
PAY FOR THOSE IN SERVICE AS ON 1/1/2006 As per FITMENT TABLE |
PAYFORNEWRECRU
-ITS NEW ENTR- ANTS AFTER 1/1/2006
|
GRADE PAY for the pay under Column (1),(2),(3) |
ย (1) |
(2) |
(3) |
||||
S-1 |
2550—3200 |
-1S |
4440-7440 |
4750 |
– |
1300 |
S-2 |
2610–3540 |
-1S |
4440-7440 |
4860 |
– |
1400 |
S-2A |
2610–4000 |
-1S |
4440-7440 |
4860 |
– |
1600 |
S-3 |
2650-4000 |
-1S |
4440-7440 |
4930 |
– |
1650 |
S-1* |
2550—3200 |
PB-1 |
4440-7440 |
5200 |
5200 |
1800 |
S-2* |
2610–3540 |
PB-1 |
4440-7440 |
5200 |
– |
1800 |
S-2A* |
2610–4000 |
PB-1 |
4440-7440 |
5200 |
– |
1800 |
S-3* |
2650-4000 |
PB-1 |
4440-7440 |
5360 |
– |
1800 |
S-4 |
2750-4400 |
PB-1 |
5200-20200 |
5530 |
– |
1800 |
S-5 |
3050-4590 |
PB-1 |
5200-20200 |
5880 |
5830 |
1900 |
S-6 |
3200-4900 |
PB-1 |
5200-20200 |
6060 |
6460 |
2000 |
S-7 |
4000-6000 |
PB-1 |
5200-20200 |
7440 |
7510 |
2400 |
S-8 |
4500-7000 |
PB-1 |
5200-20200 |
8370 |
8560 |
2800 |
S-9 |
5000-8000 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
9300 |
9300 |
4200 |
S-10 |
5500–9000 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
10230 |
– |
4200 |
S-11 |
6500–6900 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
12090 |
– |
4200 |
S-12 |
6500–10500 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
12090 |
– |
4200 |
S-13 |
7450-11500 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
13860 |
12540 |
4600 |
S-14 |
7500-12000 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
13950 |
13350 |
4800 |
S-15 |
8000–13500 |
PB-2 |
9300-34800 |
14880 |
– |
5400 |
New Scale | 8000–13500(Group A |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
ย ย ย 15600 |
15600 |
5400 |
S-16 |
9000 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
16740 |
– |
5400 |
S-17 |
9000–9550 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
16740 |
– |
5400 |
S-18 |
10325–10975 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
19210 |
– |
6600 |
S-19 |
10000–15200 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
18600 |
18750 |
6600 |
S-20 |
10650–15850 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
19810 |
– |
6600 |
S-21 |
12000–16500 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
22320 |
21900 |
7600 |
S-22 |
12750–16500 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
23720 |
– |
7600 |
S-23 |
12000–18000 |
PB-3 |
15600-39100 |
22320 |
– |
7600 |
S-24 |
14300–18300 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
37400 |
37400 |
8700 |
S-25 |
15100–18300 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
39690 |
– |
8700 |
S-26 |
16400–20000 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
39690 |
40200 |
8900 |
S-27 |
16400–20900 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
39690 |
– |
8900 |
S-28 |
14300–22400 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
37400 |
– |
10000 |
S-29 |
18400–22400 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
44700 |
43000 |
10000 |
S-30 |
22400–24500 |
PB-4 |
37400-67000 |
51850 |
– |
12000 |
S-31 |
22400–26000 |
HAG |
75500- -80000 |
75500 |
– |
Nil |
S-32 |
24050-26000 |
HAG |
75500- 80000 |
77765 |
– |
Nil |
S-33 |
26000 (Fixed) |
Apex |
80000 (Fixed) |
80000 |
– |
Nil |
S-34 |
30000 (Fixed) |
Cab.Secc |
90000 (Fixed) |
90000 |
– |
Nil |
*(Fitment of existing Group D employees on upgradation to Group C)
Let me illustrate in detail the methodology adopted by the 6th CPC for fixation of Pay in the above 3 categories of pay scales/posts:
(i) Employees who are promoted or granted promotion/MACP on or after 1st January 2006:
Employees who are promoted or provided with MACP after 01.01.2006 are granted with only one increment in the existing pay. Change to next Grade Pay in the hierarchy in these cases may fetch some financial benefit only if next grade pay in the grade pay hierarchy is different from the Grade Pay that is drawn before Promotion / MACP.
This is because next grade pay in the grade pay hierarchy is same certain cases. Even in the case of change of pay band on account of promotion, financial benefit is not significant since the initial pay in the pay band, except for Pay Band 4 (PB-4) is much lower than what is already drawn before promotion
Further, 6CPC pay fixation method for promoted / MACP employees, would not only create anomaly in the first promotion / MACP but also widen the gap in pay of promotee and direct recruits in subsequent promotions / MACP. This is because pay that is fixed in a particular cadre after implementation of 6th CPC continues for ever with grant of just one increment on promotion and change in grade pay and pay band if applicable. But, Direct Recruits (new appointees) in the same cadre will be getting higher pay as their entry pay would be much more than promotees who are seniors to them.
ย (ii) Fixation of pay for those in service as on 01.01.2006 in 6th CPC Fitment Table:
For all the employees who were drawing pay in Vth CPC pay scales S-1 to S-23, revised 6th cpc pay is the revised pay given in the fitment tables against each pre-revised pay. In most of the cases, revised pay has been determined by multiplying 1.86 factor with pre-revised pay, since DP and DA as on 01.01.2006 was 186% of pre-revised pay. However for the cadres /posts under pre-revised V CPC Scales from S-24 to S- 34 a substantial increase in Pay was granted by the 6th CPC which was much more than the actual sum total of 1.86 factor.
ย (iii) New Entrants (Direct Recruit Employees):
As far as new appointees (New Entrants) on or after 01.01.2006 are concerned, a different table as per Section II of Part A of First Schedule of CCS(Revised Pay) Rules, 2008- (Click here) is being adopted. It could be found that entry pay fixed for them is more than minimum pay in the pay band to which they belong to.
III. Vast variation in the percentage of Fitment benefits granted by 6th CPC in most of the cadres:
All the Pay Commissions upto V Pay Commission formulated new pay scale by clubbing the pre-revised Basic pay, D.A. etc. and granted some increase in the existing pre-revised basic pay which were generally in the range ofย aboutย 40 to 50% of the pre-revised basic pay(excluding D.A.) to arrive at new Basic Pay.
This hike usuallyย called as fitment benefit is given as a bonanza to central government employees by the CPC to satisfy the expectation of central government employees who desparately wait for a pay hike for a prolonged period of 10 years. As otherwise the new pay would be just the sum total of Pay and D.A. after merger which may not fetch any hike in the salary at all inspite of constitution of a New Pay Commission.
Deviating from the usual procedure the 6th CPC had devised an innovative method of showing such fitment benefit distinctly in the form of Grade Pay. This Grade Pay along with Pay constituted new Basic Pay.
The Grade Pay is taken into account for all purpose like H.R.A., D.A.,including pension fixation and pension benefits and thus showing it separately is of no significance. However this is not an issue. The real issue is vast variation in the fitment benefits among the low paid and high paid which I deal in the next heading below.
As can be seen from the table below, the 6th CPC did not grant even a single percent of increase in the Revised Pay (Except a meager increase in the Pay in S-1 to S-6 of P.B.1 ) The Revised 6th CPC Pay for these cadres were just the total of Pay, Dearness Pay, and D.A. as on 1/1/2006 The monetary benefit whatsoever was given in the form of Grade Pay which was arrived by taking approximately 28% to 78% of the maximum of the pre-revised V CPC Pay Scale.
Whereas the 6th CPC had not only granted a huge increase in the Pay for the scales / cadres from S-24 to S-34 but in addition, it also granted Grade Pay for the cadres from S-24 to S-30) resulting into double fitment benefits:
Post/ Grade |
FIFTH CPC PAY SCALE |
Name of Pay Band/ Scale |
ActualSum TotalOf PayD.P and
D.A As on 1/1/2006 @ 1.86 |
Initial Revised pay given for those in service as on 1/1/2006* |
Percen tage Of Increase In Revised Pay |
GRADE PAY |
Percentage Of Grade Pay Increase on the SUM TOTAL OF PAY D.P and D.A As on 1/1/2006 @ 1.86 |
Percentage Of Total Increase On the sum Total of Pay D.P and D.A As on 1/1/2006 (6+8) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
S-1 |
2550—3200 |
-1S |
4750 |
4750 |
0% |
1300 |
27.37% |
27.37% |
S-2 |
2610–3540 |
-1S |
4860 |
4860 |
0% |
1400 |
28.80% |
28.80% |
S-2A |
2610–4000 |
-1S |
4860 |
4860 |
0% |
1600 |
32.92% |
32.92% |
S-3 |
2650-4000 |
-1S |
4930 |
4930 |
0% |
1650 |
33.47% |
33.47% |
S-1* |
2550—3200 |
PB-1 |
4750 |
5200 |
9.47% |
1800 |
37.89% |
47.36% |
S-2* |
2610–3540 |
PB-1 |
4860 |
5200 |
6.99% |
1800 |
37.03% |
44.02% |
S-2A* |
2610–4000 |
PB-1 |
4860 |
5200 |
6.99% |
1800 |
37.03% |
44.02% |
S-3* |
2650-4000 |
PB-1 |
4930 |
5360 |
8.72% |
1800 |
36.51% |
45.23% |
S-4 |
2750-4400 |
PB-1 |
5120 |
5530 |
8% |
1800 |
35.16% |
43.16% |
S-5 |
3050-4590 |
PB-1 |
5680 |
5880 |
3.52% |
1900 |
33.45% |
36.97% |
S-6 |
3200-4900 |
PB-1 |
5960 |
6060 |
1.68% |
2000 |
33.56% |
35.24% |
S-7 |
4000-6000 |
PB-1 |
7440 |
7440 |
0% |
2400 |
32.26% |
32.26% |
S-8 |
4500-7000 |
PB-1 |
8370 |
8370 |
0% |
2800 |
33.45% |
33.45% |
S-9 |
5000-8000 |
PB-2 |
9300 |
9300 |
0% |
4200 |
45.16% |
45.16% |
S-10 |
5500–9000 |
PB-2 |
10230 |
10230 |
0% |
4200 |
41.06 |
41.06% |
S-11 |
6500–6900 |
PB-2 |
12090 |
12090 |
0% |
4200 |
34.74% |
34.74% |
S-12 |
6500–10500 |
PB-2 |
12090 |
12090 |
0% |
4200 |
34.74% |
34.74% |
S-13 |
7450-11500 |
PB-2 |
13860 |
13860 |
0% |
4600 |
33.19% |
33.19% |
S-14 |
7500-12000 |
PB-2 |
13950 |
13950 |
0% |
4800 |
34.41% |
34.41% |
S-15 |
8000–13500 |
PB-2 |
14880 |
14880 |
0% |
5400 |
36.29% |
36.29% |
New Scale | 8000–13500(Group A |
PB-3 |
14880 |
15600 |
4.84% |
5400 |
36.29% |
41.13% |
S-16 |
9000 |
PB-3 |
16740 |
16740 |
0% |
5400 |
32.26 |
32.26% |
S-17 |
9000–9550 |
PB-3 |
16740 |
16740 |
0% |
5400 |
32.26 |
32.26% |
S-18 |
10325–10975 |
PB-3 |
19210 |
19210 |
0% |
6600 |
34.36 |
34.36% |
S-19 |
10000–15200 |
PB-3 |
18600 |
18600 |
0% |
6600 |
35.48 |
35.48% |
S-20 |
10650–15850 |
PB-3 |
19810 |
19810 |
0% |
6600 |
33.32 |
33.32% |
S-21 |
12000–16500 |
PB-3 |
22320 |
22320 |
0% |
7600 |
34.05 |
34.05% |
S-22 |
12750–16500 |
PB-3 |
23720 |
23720 |
0% |
7600 |
32.04 |
32.04% |
S-23 |
12000–18000 |
PB-3 |
22320 |
22320 |
0% |
7600 |
34.05 |
34.05% |
S-24 |
14300–18300 |
PB-4 |
26600 |
37400 |
40.6% |
8700 |
32.71 |
73.31% |
S-25 |
15100–18300 |
PB-4 |
28090 |
39690 |
41.3% |
8700 |
30.97 |
72.27% |
S-26 |
16400–20000 |
PB-4 |
30510 |
39690 |
30.09% |
8900 |
29.17 |
59.26% |
S-27 |
16400–20900 |
PB-4 |
30510 |
39690 |
30.09% |
8900 |
29.17 |
59.26% |
S-28 |
14300–22400 |
PB-4 |
26600 |
37400 |
40.6% |
10000 |
37.59 |
78.19% |
S-29 |
18400–22400 |
PB-4 |
34230 |
44700 |
30.59% |
10000 |
29.21 |
59.8% |
S-30 |
22400–24500 |
PB-4 |
41670 |
51850 |
24.43% |
12000 |
28.80 |
53.23% |
S-31 |
22400–26000 |
HAG |
41670 |
75500 |
81.19% |
Nil |
0% |
81.19% |
S-32 |
24050-26000 |
HAG |
44740 |
77765 |
73.82% |
Nil |
0% |
73.82% |
S-33 |
26000 (Fixed) |
Apex |
48360 |
80000 |
65.43% |
Nil |
0% |
65.43% |
S-34 |
30000 (Fixed) |
Cab.Secc |
55800 |
90000 |
61.29% |
Nil |
0% |
61.29% |
Let me hasten to add that I do not question payment of such huge percentage of fitment benefits to certain cadres. Let them get it. Because they deserve it and so are every one. The crux of the issue is why such fitment benefits were not equally extended to all cadres in equal percentage so that there will not be any resentment among central government employees.
Conclusion:
In a nutshell, I am of the view that Pay scale pattern, pay fixation pattern, Fitment benefits method etc. adopted by the earlier pay commissions up to 5th Pay Commission were comparatively far better than that of 6th Pay Commission.
Let us hope that the above details attract the special attention of the 7th Central Pay Commission and let us expect they too realize the necessity of revision of pay without any anomalies
M.Dorai
Deputy Director
ESIC Model Hospital
Ministry of Labour, Government of India
A very in depth study. It gives a lot of information on over all impact on various Pay Scales of V pay commission.
All CPCs have been fiddling with Pay Scales. This is done with the laudable aim of reducing the plethora of existing pay scales and remove disparities. But it ends up creating havoc among various cadres. Superior- subordinate relationship is disturbed and creates working level difficulties. Consequently, post each CPC, an Anomalies Committee is invariably formed to resolve such wrinkles.
It would be better if CPCs cease to tinker with pay scales. They should simply suggest an increase in Basic Pay, other issues be left to the executive. i.e. Ministry Of Personnel etc. In addition, CPCs may take up issue of rationalising and clubbing of allowances. That does not affect the seniority and cadre issues.
Respected Sir , I want to suggest on the differences between the class Pay and Good Service Pay between of Army, Navy and Air Force. Army, Navy and Air Force personals (Upto Havildar/ equivalent ranks) are entitled to Three Class Pay and Three Good Service pay as per 6th pay commission. A Havildar of Army is entitled to maximum Rs 300/-( Rs 100 for class three, Rs 200/- for class two and Rs 300/- for class Ist respectively) and Rs 192/- for Good Service Pay (Rs 64/- for Ist Good Service Pay, Rs 128/- for Second Good Service Pay and Rs 192/- for third pay respectively). On calculation of total amount of Class pay and Good Service Pay an Army Havildar is entitled to Rs 492/- for class pay plus Good Service Pay, whereas an Air Force Sargent(Equivalent to Havildar of Army) is entitled to Rs. 540/- for same payment in 6th Pay Commission which is being reflected in Air Force Pay slip with description of “GCB+ Class Pay”. I hope some other differences like as above are in order in previous pay commission between Army, Navy and Air Force. Role of Army, Navy and Air Force is same but their duties are different to each other. For example, an Army personal (Havildar rank) is entitled to Special Compensatory Counter Insurgency Allowance (SCCIA) for Rs 5400/- per month and deployed in forward Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir like Poonch Sector, Machhal Sector and Kupwara Sector, whereas an Air Force Sargent(Equivalent to Havildar of Army) who is deployed in Srinagar (J&K) is entitled for same allowance in same rate, rate of this allowance should be re-classified to keep in mind of nature of cold climate and nature of duty for which individual deployed. Your are requested to study on 6th pay commission report and rectify the above discrepancy between nature of duty /Army and Air Force in 7th Pay Commission to keep equivalent pay and allowance in tri service
(A) The major lacunae in the 6th pay commission recommendations are
(i) Reduction of No. of Pay bands
(ii) Vast difference between pay bands
(iii) very meager difference between grade pays ( in 100 (or) 200 rupees differences)
(iv) There is no difference between promotion and Annual increment benefits ( both just 3%)
Our expectations to be done in the 7th PC are as follows:-
Introduce 3 additional pay bands ( in paper) and then create parallel pay bands in the 7PC as detailed below: to have more differentiation between various level of posts.,
Therefore:-
1) Introduce a pay band of Rs. 7,500 – 22800 between 5200- 20200 and 9300-34800
2) Introduce a pay band of Rs. 12400 – 26500 between 9300-34800 and 15600 – 39100
3) Introduce a pay band of Rs. 25800 – 32600 between 15600-39100 and 37400-67000
In the modern age of computers and e-governance, paradise will not be lost what so ever if we have few additional pay bands to have meaningful difference between various posts
(B) The difference between Grade pays must be at least Rs.500
(C) Minimum of 5% increment must be awarded annually
(D) Each promotion must have a benefit of least 10% of pay notionally
Due to merger of pay scales of 5th PC in the 6th PC and introduction of Pay bands and grade pay system, many categories have suffered immense lose in their pay benefits. A small example is given below
Prior to 6th pay commission the pay scale of a Secretariat ASO was 6500 and the pay scale of the Section officer (or) Superintendent of Government department other than that of Secretariat was 5500 which is a supervisory post. After a long legal battle, the Supreme Court of India has directed to place the supervisory cadre over and above the ASOs so that their basic pay scale was fixed as Rs. 7000. unfortunately during 6th PC due to the bad policy of merging pay scales both the above categories were placed in the same pay band of 9300-34800 and the difference was shown only in the Grade pay with a narrow difference of Rs. 200 i.e 4600 GP for an ASO and Rs. 4800 in case of Departmental supervisory cadre, which has defeated the very essence of the judgement of the Supreme Court of India.
Such anomalies must be considered favorably and the present PC should take utmost care to overcome the anomalies found in the basic structure of the 6th pay commission
Thanking you
Sir,
My Basic Pay is Rs. 8770 and Grade Pay is Rs. 2400 In the payband of 5200-20200
what will be my pay band and amount of increment as per 7 th CPC