Rule 32 of CCS (CCA) Rules – Advice of UPSC to be communicated to Government servant along with the final order of penalty No. 11012/8/2011-Estt.(A) Government of India Ministry of Personnel, PG & Pensions Department of Personnel & Training North Block, New Delhi January 6, 2014 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject: – Rule 32 of the Central…
Hota Committee Report on submission of draft charge sheet while seeking first stage advice of CVC, etc. – Acceptance by Government
Hota Committee Report – Para 35 of the Committee’s Report on conduct of hearings on a day to day basis – Acceptance by Government
Hota Committee Report – Conclusion of major penalty proceedings within a period of 18 months – Acceptance by Government
Handbook for Inquiry Officers and Disciplinary Authorities
Officers applied for VRS can not take sensitive decision in Office – Ministry of Finance issues instructions
Central Vigilance Commission’s jurisdiction over employees of Multi-State Cooperative Societies like NAFED, KRIBHCO etc
The undersigned is directed to refer to Department’s Office Memorandum No.372/19/2011-AVD-III(Pt.I) dated 26th September, 2011 regarding strengthening of vigilance set-up in Ministries/Departments, wherein, on the basis of a recommendation made by the Group of Ministers to tackle Corruption, which was accepted by the Government, all the Ministries/Departments were advised to strengthen their vigilance administration with requisite man power with a view to ensuring expeditious disposal of disciplinary cases
Instructions have been issued in the past for expeditious disposal of disciplinary proceedings against delinquent government servants. However, it has been observed that disciplinary proceedings are generally taking a long time which defeats the very purpose of initiating the said proceedings. Therefore, it has been considered necessary to issue the following guidelines for monitoring and expeditious disposal of disciplinary proceedings
Instructions issued vide O.M. No. 22012/1/99-Estt. (D) dated 25.10.2004 based on the O.M. No. 22011/4/1991-Estt. (A) dated 14.09.1992 (issued on the basis of procedure laid down by Supreme Court in K.V. Jankiraman case AIR 1991 SC 2010) makes it clear that vigilance clearance for promotion may be denied only in the following three circumstances:-
whether Government has issued a missive to all Ministries/Departments, Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and Public Sector Banks to strictly follow a time limit of three months in taking action against corrupt officials
whether it is a fact that according to the Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, 1964, no Government servant, except with the prior approval of Government, could contest election in cooperative societies, Residents Welfare Association (RWA) etc. or hold an elected post