Selection of Medical De-categorized staff against 20% LDCE quota – Railway Board
Selection of Medical De-categorized staff against 20% LDCE quota – Railway Board Order RBE No. 40/2023 dated 02.03.2023
RBE No. 40/2023
भारत सरकार/GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
रेल मंत्रालय/MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(रेलवे बोर्ड/RAILWAY BOARD)
No. E(NG)I-2023/PM4/2
New Delhi, dated 02.03.2023
The General Manager (P),
All Zonal Railways and PUs etc,
( As per standard list).
Sub: Selection of Medical De-categorized staff against 20% LDCE quota.
One of the Zonal Railways has sought clarification as to whether such medically de-categorized staff who are absorbed in alternate posts in the ministerial cadre, may be allowed to count their service in their previous unit prior to decategorization, towards eligibility for 20% LDCE in OS category.
2. The matter has been examined in Board’s office in the light of provisions contained in para 1309 of IREM Vol. I., and it is clarified that earlier service rendered in the previous unit in the relevant scale (just prior to medical de-categorization) may be counted along with service in the alternative post towards eligibility for all departmental examinations including LDCE.
3. This disposes off N. C. Railway’s letter No.797-E/NCR/JHS/05/20% LDCE dated 15.02.2023 cited above.
(Sanjay Kumar)
Deputy Director Estt.(N)
Railway Board
Tele No. 23303658
Source: Indian Railways

📢 Stay Updated with GConnect
Join our Whatsapp channels for the latest news and job updates:
Join GConnect News Join GConnect JobsGConnect News
GConnect Jobs
You might also like:
IRTSA Flags Key Issues in 8th CPC Online Submission Process, Seeks Major Revisions
Vigilance Clearance: CVC Revises Proforma, Expands Details Required Under Point No. 7
Government Prioritising AI Upskilling of Employees Through iGOT Karmayogi Platform: DoPT
What Counts as “Unbecoming Conduct” Under CCS Conduct Rules? Real Examples Explained
Pay Fixation on Promotion or MACP Governed by CCS (Revised Pay) Rules 2016 and Fundamental Rules: Finance Ministry
7th CPC: Government Clarifies Rule on Next Increment in Pay Stepping Up Cases