Revision of Pension of Pre 2006 Pensioners from 1st January 2006 – Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgement
Revision of Pension of Pre 2006 Pensioners from 1st January 2006 – Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgement – Four Months granted for Revision of Pension on the basis of Revised Concordance Table with effect from 01.01.2006
Hon’ble Supreme Court has recently dismissed the SLP in Civil Appeals filed by the Govt against the orders favouring Pre 2006 Pensioners for revision of pension of pre 2006 pensioners with effect from 1st January 2006 on the basis of revised concordance table. Apex Court has also granted four months time for implementation of CAT’s order for granting revised pension from January 2006 instead of 2012.
Check the following links for more details of revision of pension of Pre 2006 pensioners
- Granting of legitimate benefits to pre 2006 pensioners as per DoP&T’s 2009 Orders regarding NF Upgradation
- Revision of pension w.e.f. 01/01/2006 of pre-2006 pensioners who retired from the 5th CPC scale
- Disability pension to pre-2006 disability pensioners boarded out from service with less than 10 yrs of qualifying service
- Revision of pension of Pre-01.01.2006 retiree Havildar granted Hony Rank of Nb Subedar
- Revision of Pension of Pre-2006 Pensioners – Supreme Court Judgement
- Revision of pension wef 01.01.2006 of Pre-2006 pensioners retired from 5th CPC scale
- Pension revision of Pre-2006 pensioners who retired from the 5th CPC scale of Rs. 6500-10500/-
- Revision of pension of Pre-2006 pensioners who retired from the 5th CPC scale
- Revision of pension for Pre-2006 pensioners retired from 5th CPC scale of Rs. 6500-10500/-
- Revision of Pension of Pre-96 & Pre-2006 Pensioners – PCDA
- Revision of Pension of Pre 2006 Pensioners – RSCWS writes to the Minister of Finance
- Modified parity in revision of pension of pre-2006 Pensioners – Department of Pension Clarification
- Revision of Pension of Pre-2006 Pensioners consequent on Delinking of Qualifying Service
- Revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners delinking of qualifying service of 33 years for revised pension
- CPAO : 7th CPC – Revision of pension of pre-2016 Pensioners / Family Pensioners, etc
- Changes in 7th CPC Pension Concordance Table 51 and Table 52
- PCDA Circular C-169 : 7th Pay Commission Revision of Pension of Pre-2016 Pensioners/ Family Pensioners
- Revision of Pension for Pre-2006 Pensioners retired as NCC whole time Officers
- Action Taken Report on 29th SCOVA Minutes of Meeting
- Disposal of pending pre-2006 pension revision cases
- 7th Pay Commission Pension – 3rd Option suggested by Dept Side welcomed by Staff Side
- 7th CPC recommendation – Pre-2016 pensioners Pay determination
- Delinking of service for pension – Pre-2006 pensioners in the rank of JCOs/ ORs and Commissioned Officers)
- Revision of Enhanced Rate of Ordinary Family Pension in respect of Pre-2006 Armed Forces Pensioners
- Defence Pension qualifying Service for JCO / OR and commissioned officers relaxed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S). 8875-8876 OF 2011
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
C.A. No.1998 of 2012,
C.A.No.3564 of 2012,
C.A.No.3907 of 2012,
C.A.No.4581 of 2012,
C.A.No.4952 of 2012,
C.A.No.4980 of 2012,
C.A.No.4599 of 2013,
C.A.No.1 of 2015
AND
SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013,
SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014 &
SLP(C)No……… of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904)
O R D E R
Heard.
Delay condoned.
C.A.Nos.8875-76 of 2011, C.A. No.1998 of 2012, C.A.No.3564 of 2012, C.A.No.3907 of 2012, C.A.No.4581 of 2012, C.A.No.4952 of 2012, C.A.No.4980 of 2012:
We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.
The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed.
C.A.No.4599 of 2013, C.A.No.1 of 2015 :
No substantial question of law of general/public importance arises for our consideration in these applications for leave to appeal.
The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the applications for leave to appeal dismissed.
SLP(C)Nos.36148-36150 of 2013
SLP(C)No.16780-16782 of 2014& SLP(C)Nos………..of 2015 (CC Nos.16903-16904):
We see no reason to interfere with the orders impugned.
The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed.
Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General,
however submits that in view of the nature of the controversy as also the extent of financial burden arising out of the implementation of the impugned orders, the petitioners-U.O.I.
may be given reasonable time to do the needful. That prayer is not opposed by counsel opposite.
We accordingly grant four months’ time from today to the petitioners to comply with the impugned orders failing which the contempt petitions pending before the Tribunal can be revived by the concerned petitioners and taken to their logical conclusion.
All impleading and intervention applications are also dismissed.
…………………..J
(T.S. THAKUR)
…………………..J
(R. BANUMATHI)
NEW DELHI
DATED 17th March, 2015.
Source:
BPS
What remains to be seen are (i) If the verdict would be applicable to a Pre 2006 Pensioners, (ii) Would there be another attempt from UOI to delay the issue by filing another appeal, say, in the form of a Curative Petition and (iii) if this would be implemented in toto within the laid down time-frame!!